Profile and clinical relevance of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in patients diagnosed with or highly suspected of APS.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the positivity and relevance of non-criteria aPLs with clinical phenotypes in patients highly suspected of or diagnosed with APS. METHODS: Outpatient cases were included from a prospectively maintained database, and patients were grouped into APS (n = 168), seronegative APS (SNAPS, n = 9), those meeting the diagnostic criteria for clinical events without laboratory results (only-event, n = 15), those that had aPL positivity without clinical manifestations (asymptomatic APA, n = 39), and healthy controls (n = 88). Criteria aPL results and APS-related clinical features were extracted. Sixteen non-criteria aPLs were tested and analysed. RESULTS: LA, aCL and anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I were positive in 84.5%, 61.3% and 74.4% of APS patients, and 61.5%, 59.0% and 74.4% of asymptomatic APA patients, respectively. In patients negative for criteria serological tests, 23 out of 24 were positive for at least one non-criteria aPL. Triple-positive patients also had significantly higher tests of some aPLs in comparison with other groups. Stroke was associated with anti-phosphatidyl-inositol (aPI) IgG and anti-phosphatidyl-glycerol (aPG) IgG. Late embryonic loss correlated with aPI IgM, and premature birth/eclampsia was associated with aPI IgG and aPG IgG. There were also positive associations between heart valve lesions and anti-phosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgM, APS nephropathy and anti-phosphatidyl-choline IgG or aPS/PT IgG, and livedo reticularis and anti-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine IgM. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of non-criteria aPLs differed from diagnostic biomarkers in patients diagnosed with or suspected of APS. Detection of aPLs provided additive value in the evaluation of APS-related clinical manifestations.

Anti-SmD1 antibodies are associated with renal disorder, seizures, and pulmonary arterial hypertension in Chinese patients with active SLE.

Detection of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) plays an important role in timely diagnosis and earlier treatment of SLE. In this study, we used a SmD1 polypeptide-based ELISA to determine anti-SmD1 antibody in 269 SLE, including100 naïve (had not been treated with steroids or immunosuppressants at study inception) SLE patients and 169 non-naive SLE patients; 233 controls with other rheumatic diseases (RDC) (70 RA, 40 AS, 73SSc, and 50 SS), and 110 healthy controls (HC) group. The positive rate of anti-SmD1 among all SLE patients was 60.97%, higher than that in the RDC group (13.30%, P = 0.000) or the HC group (9.09%, P = 0.000). The positive rate of anti-SmD1 in non-naive SLE patients was higher than that for anti-dsDNA antibodies (44.97%, P = 0.03). Positivity for anti-SmD1 only was found in 14.00% of naive SLE patients and 16.00% of non-naive SLE patients. In naive SLE patients, the serum concentration of anti-SmD1 was lower after treatment than before treatment (P = 0.039). Active SLE patients positive for anti-SmD1 were more likely to have malar rash, rash, nonscarring alopecia, PAH and hypocomplementemia. High positivity for anti-SmD1 only in patients with SLE indicated the importance and necessity of detection of anti-SmD1 in patients with SLE.